placement preference

March 2014

New York Times article on the debate between preserving heritage and permanency for American Indian children

By |2016-12-01T19:33:03-06:00March 19th, 2014|Categories: Stability, Permanency, and Adoption|Tags: , , , , , |

This guest post was written by Tarynn Anderson. Photo by Mark Holm for the New York Times The article, Focus on Preserving Heritage Can Limit Foster Care for Indians, by Dan Frosch, published on January 26, 2013 in the New York Times, explores the importance of the Indian Child Welfare Act and how [...]

Comments Off on New York Times article on the debate between preserving heritage and permanency for American Indian children

January 2014

Child welfare-related bills introduced in the interim of the Minnesota legislative session

By |2016-12-01T19:33:05-06:00January 15th, 2014|Categories: CASCW at the Capitol|Tags: , , |

Although the Minnesota legislative session does not officially begin until February 25, quite a few bills were introduced in the interim on Monday. Because there are several that may impact children, youth, and families involved in child welfare (or at risk of involvement), I have decided to write two posts providing brief descriptions of these [...]

Comments Off on Child welfare-related bills introduced in the interim of the Minnesota legislative session

July 2012

New foster care legislation in Minnesota, part 2

By |2016-12-01T19:33:15-06:00July 18th, 2012|Categories: Stability, Permanency, and Adoption|Tags: , , , , , , |

On Monday, we highlighted some of the changes to the foster care statutes that were passed in the 2012 legislative session in Minnesota. This post will continue the focus on the foster care changes that were made. Many of the changes impact relatives. Changes to the law regarding relative search include: The court may now [...]

Comments Off on New foster care legislation in Minnesota, part 2
Go to Top